Completeness as a proxy
Evidence completeness rewards people who can gather documents and penalises those in crisis.
Step 6 of 12Risk flags
Compare with the red-team review
Sign in to save your workCompare your analysis with the red-team review. Each flag is a line of enquiry, not a conclusion.
Equality disparities
Disabled, older and abuse-affected applicants are under-represented in band A.
Fettered discretion
'Work in band order' means the tool effectively decides who is assessed first.
No equality impact assessment
Deployed without an EIA, so the public sector equality duty may not have been met.
DPIA by the supplier
The council, as controller, has not completed its own assessment.
Reasonable adjustments
Applicants who cannot complete forms are not offered alternatives.
Digital exclusion
OCR errors push paper applicants down the queue.
No transparency
Applicants and the public are not told how the tool works or how to challenge it.
Weak approval route
Approved under delegated powers without member oversight or a published record.
Confidentiality versus FOI
Supplier confidentiality may conflict with the council's transparency obligations.
What did you find, and what did you miss?
Which of these did your earlier analysis already cover?
Which did you miss? What does each change about your assessment?
Answers save automatically and sync to your account when you are signed in.