Step 1 of 12Brief
01 · Scenario brief

Read the business request

Sign in to save your work

Read the request as a governance practitioner. Your task is to test whether the case for PolicyAI is supported by evidence, not to validate the solution.

GUIDED SCENARIO · ENTERPRISE GENAI AND RAG
“PolicyAI is popular and saves HR time, but we have had two incidents. Should we keep it running, and what must change?”
FICTIONAL ORGANISATIONMeridian Logistics GroupYour role: AI governance and privacy risk reviewer working with the Chief People Officer and the Data Protection Officer

PolicyAI is a chat assistant on the staff intranet. It searches Meridian's HR document library, passes the most relevant passages to a third-party large language model and returns an answer with a cited source.

IN SIMPLE TERMS

Staff type a question about pay, leave or policies. The system looks up documents and asks an AI model to write an answer. If it picks up the wrong document, or one it should never have seen, people get wrong advice or see private information.

THIS SIMULATION PROVIDES
  • Six evidence documents
  • Five fictional staff queries
  • Simulated answers with cited sources
  • A sample of answers to test against current policy
Leaders expect it to:
  • Answer routine HR questions instantly
  • Cut HR helpdesk tickets by 40%
  • Give consistent answers across 38 sites
  • Free HR advisers for complex cases

Your first challenge

Write your opening questions before you look at the evidence.

Think about purpose, data, affected people, evidence, accountability and the human role…

Answers save automatically and sync to your account when you are signed in.

Training simulation only. Not for live HR or employment decisions.

Every organisation, person and figure is fictional. Do not enter real personal, customer or patient information.