Step 1 of 12Brief
01 · Scenario brief

Read the business request

Sign in to save your work

Read the request as a governance practitioner. Your task is to test whether the case for ClaimReview AI is supported by evidence, not to validate the solution.

GUIDED SCENARIO · INSURANCE
“The Board is pleased with fraud savings, but complaints and an internal fairness concern have reached us. Give us an assurance view and a recommendation.”
FICTIONAL ORGANISATIONHarbourside Mutual InsuranceYour role: AI governance and conduct-risk reviewer reporting to the Chief Risk Officer

ClaimReview AI scores every home and motor claim for fraud likelihood. Claims above 0.70 go to the Special Investigations Unit (SIU) queue instead of normal handling; payment is held until an investigator clears them.

IN SIMPLE TERMS

When someone makes an insurance claim, a computer estimates how likely it is to be fraud. High scores are sent to investigators and the payout waits. If the computer wrongly suspects honest people, they wait weeks without knowing why.

THIS SIMULATION PROVIDES
  • Six evidence documents
  • Five fictional claimants
  • Simulated fraud scores
  • A sample of SIU cases to test
Leaders expect it to:
  • Detect more fraudulent claims
  • Reduce investigator workload on low-risk claims
  • Pay genuine claims faster
  • Lower the claims cost ratio

Your first challenge

Write your opening questions before you look at the evidence.

Think about purpose, data, affected people, evidence, accountability and the human role…

Answers save automatically and sync to your account when you are signed in.

Training simulation only. Not for live claims decisions.

Every organisation, person and figure is fictional. Do not enter real personal, customer or patient information.